16. Should the whole amount of his property between cash and goods

not amount to 10,000 _lire_ (though he believes he has fully as much), his bequests are to be ratably diminished, except those to his own children which he does not wish diminished. Should any legatee die before receiving the bequest, its amount shall fall to the Testator’s heir male, and failing such, the half to go to Marco or his male heir, and the other half to be distributed for the good of the souls aforesaid. The witnesses are Lionardo priest of S. Felice, Lionardo clerk of the same, and the Notary Pietro Pagano priest of the same. [2] According to Romanin (I. 321) the _lira dei grossi_ was also called _Lira d’imprestidi_, and if the _lire_ here are to be so taken, the sum will be 10,000 ducats, the largest amount by far that occurs in any of these Polo documents, unless, indeed, the 1000 _lire_ in § 5 of Maffeo Junior’s Will be the like; but I have some doubt if such lire are intended in either case. [3] “(Resolved) That grace be granted to the respectable MARCO PAULO, relieving him of the penalty he has incurred for neglecting to have his water-pipe examined, seeing that he was ignorant of the order on that subject.” (See _Appendix C._ No. 3.) The other reference, to M. Polo, of S. Geremia, runs as follows:— [_MCCCII. indic. XV. die VIII. Macii q̄ fiat grā Gūillō aurifici q̄ ipe absolvat a pena ī qua dicit icurisse p̄ uno spōtono sibi iūeto veuiēdo de Mestre p̄p̄e domū Macī Pauli de Canaregio ūi descenderat ad bibendū._] “That grace be granted to William the Goldsmith, relieving him of the penalty which he is stated to have incurred on account of a spontoon (_spontono_, a loaded bludgeon) found upon him near the house of MARCO PAULO of Cannareggio, where he had landed to drink on his way from Mestre.” (See _Cicogna_, V. p. 606.) [4] _Sansovino, Venezia, Città Nobilissima e Singolare, Descritta_, etc., Ven. 1581, f. 236 _v._; _Barbaro, Alberi; Coronelli, Allante Veneto_, I. 19. [5] The word _Millio_ occurs several times in the Chronicle of the Doge Andrea Dandolo, who wrote about 1342; and _Milion_ occurs at least once (besides the application of the term to Polo) in the History of Giovanni Villani; viz. when he speaks of the Treasury of Avignon:— “_diciotto_ milioni _di fiorini d’oro_ ec. _che ogni_ milione _è mille migliaja di fiorini d’ oro la valuta_.” (xi. 20, § 1; _Ducange_, and _Vocab. Univ. Ital._). But the definition, thought necessary by Villani, in itself points to the use of the word as rare. _Domilion_ occurs in the estimated value of houses at Venice in 1367, recorded in the _Cronaca Magna_ in St. Mark’s Library. (_Romanin_, III. 385). [6] “Also; that Pardon be granted to Bonocio of Mestre for that 152 _lire_ in which he stood condemned by the Captains of the Posts, on account of wine smuggled by him, in such wise: to wit, that he was to pay the said fine in 4 years by annual instalments of one fourth, to be retrenched from the pay due to him on his journey in the suite of our ambassadors, with assurance that anything then remaining deficient of his instalments should be made good by himself or his securities. And his securities are the Nobles Pietro Morosini and MARCO PAULO MILION̄.” Under _Milion̄_ is written in an ancient hand “_mortuus_.” (See _Appendix C_, No. 4.) [7] Humboldt tells this (_Examen_, II. 221), alleging _Jacopo d’Acqui_ as authority; and Libri (_H. des Sciences Mathématiques_, II. 149), quoting _Doglioni, Historia Veneziana_. But neither authority bears out the citations. The story seems really to come from Amoretti’s commentary on the _Voyage du Cap. L. F. Maldonado_, Plaisance, 1812, p. 67. Amoretti quotes as authority _Pignoria, Degli Dei Antichi_. An odd revival of this old libel was mentioned to me recently by Mr. George Moffatt. When he was at school it was common among the boys to express incredulity by the phrase: “Oh, what a Marco Polo!” [8] Thibault, according to Ducange, was in 1307 named Grand Master of the Arblasteers of France; and Buchon says his portrait is at Versailles among the Admirals (No. 1170). Ramon de Muntaner fell in with the Seigneur de Cepoy in Greece, and speaks of him as “but a Captain of the Wind, as his Master was King of the Wind.” (See _Ducange, H. de l’Empire de Const. sous les Emp. François_, Venice ed. 1729, pp. 109, 110; _Buchon, Chroniques Etrangères_, pp. lv. 467–470.) [9] The note is not found in the Bodleian MS., which is the third known one of this precise type. [10] Messire Jean, the son of Thibault, is mentioned in the accounts of the latter in the _Chambre des Comptes_ at Paris, as having been with his Father in Romania. And in 1344 he commanded a confederate Christian armament sent to check the rising power of the Turks, and beat a great Turkish fleet in the Greek seas. (_Heyd._ I. 377; _Buchon_, 468.) [11] The document is given in _Appendix C_, No. 5. It was found by Comm. Barozzi, the Director of the Museo Civico, when he had most kindly accompanied me to aid in the search for certain other documents in the archives of the _Casa di Ricovero_, or Poor House of Venice. These archives contain a great mass of testamentary and other documents, which probably have come into that singular depository in connection with bequests to public charities. The document next mentioned was found in as strange a site, viz., the _Casa degli Esposti_ or Foundling Hospital, which possesses similar muniments. This also I owe to Comm. Barozzi, who had noted it some years before, when commencing an arrangement of the archives of the Institution. [12] The Legal Year at Venice began on the 1st of March. And 1324 was 7th of the Indiction. Hence the date is, according to the modern Calendar, 1324. [13] Marsden says of Moreta and Fantina, the only daughters named by Ramusio, that these may be thought rather familiar terms of endearment than baptismal names. This is a mistake however. _Fantina_ is from one of the parochial saints of Venice, S. Fantino, and the male name was borne by sundry Venetians, among others by a son of Henry Dandolo’s. Moreta is perhaps a variation of Maroca, which seems to have been a family name among the Polos. We find also the male name of Bellela, written _Bellello_, _Bellero_, _Belletto_. [14] The _Decima_ went to the Bishop of Castello (eventually converted into Patriarch of Venice) to divide between himself, the Clergy, the Church, and the Poor. It became a source of much bad feeling, which came to a head after the plague of 1348, when some families had to pay the tenth three times within a very short space. The existing Bishop agreed to a composition, but his successor Paolo Foscari (1367) claimed that on the death of every citizen an exact inventory should be made, and a full tithe levied. The Signory fought hard with the Bishop, but he fled to the Papal Court and refused all concession. After his death in 1376 a composition was made for 5500 ducats yearly. (_Romanin_, II. 406; III. 161, 165.) [15] There is a difficulty about estimating the value of these sums from the variety of Venice pounds or _lire_. Thus the _Lira dei piccoli_ was reckoned 3 to the ducat or zecchin, the _Lira ai grossi_ 2 to the ducat, but the _Lira_ dei _grossi_ or _Lira d’imprestidi_ was equal to 10 ducats, or (allowing for higher value of silver then) about 3_l._ 15_s._; a little more than the equivalent of the then Pound sterling. This last money is _specified_ in some of the bequests, as in the 20 soldi (or 1 lira) to St. Lorenzo, and in the annuity of 8 lire to Polo’s wife; but it seems doubtful what money is meant when _libra_ only or _libra denariorum venetorum_ is used. And this doubt is not new. Gallicciolli relates that in 1232 Giacomo Menotto left to the Church of S. Cassiano as an annuity _libras denariorum venetorum quatuor_. Till 1427 the church received the income as of _lire dei piccoli_, but on bringing a suit on the subject it was adjudged that _lire ai grossi_ were to be understood. (_Delle Mem. Venet. Ant._ II. 18.) This story, however, cuts both ways, and does not decide our doubt. [16] The form of the name _Ysabeta_ aptly illustrates the transition that seems so strange from _Elizabeth_ into the _Isabel_ that the Spaniards made of it. [17] _I.e._ the extent of what was properly called the Dogado, all along the Lagoons from Grado on the extreme east to Capo d’Argine (Cavarzere at the mouth of the Adige) on the extreme west. [18] The word rendered _Guilds_ is “_Scholarum_.” The crafts at Venice were united in corporations called _Fraglie_ or _Scholae_, each of which had its statutes, its head called the _Gastald_, and its place of meeting under the patronage of some saint. These acted as societies of mutual aid, gave dowries to poor girls, caused masses to be celebrated for deceased members, joined in public religious processions, etc., nor could any craft be exercised except by members of such a guild. (_Romanin_, I. 390.) [19] A few years after Ser Marco’s death (1328) we find the Great Council granting to this Peter the rights of a natural Venetian, as having been a long time at Venice, and well-conducted. (See App. C, _Calendar of Documents_, No. 13.) This might give some additional colour to M. Pauthier’s supposition that this Peter the Tartar was a faithful servant who had accompanied Messer Marco from the East 30 years before. But yet the supposition is probably unfounded. Slavery and slave-trade were very prevalent at Venice in the Middle Ages, and V. Lazari, a writer who examined a great many records connected therewith, found that by far the greater number of slaves were described as _Tartars_. There does not seem to be any clear information as to how they were imported, but probably from the factories on the Black Sea, especially Tana after its establishment. A tax of 5 ducats per head was set on the export of slaves in 1379, and as the revenue so received under the Doge Tommaso Mocenigo (1414–1423) amounted (so says Lazari) to 50,000 ducats, the startling conclusion is that 10,000 slaves yearly were exported! This it is difficult to accept. The slaves were chiefly employed in domestic service, and the records indicate the women to have been about twice as numerous as the men. The highest price recorded is 87 ducats paid for a Russian girl sold in 1429. All the higher prices are for young women; a significant circumstance. With the existence of this system we may safely connect the extraordinary frequence of mention of illegitimate children in Venetian wills and genealogies. (See _Lazari, Del Traffico degli Schiavi in Venezia_, etc., in _Miscellanea di Storia Italiana_, I. 463 _seqq._) In 1308 the Khan Toktai of Kipchak (see Polo, II. 496), hearing that the Genoese and other Franks were in the habit of carrying off Tartar children to sell, sent a force against Caffa, which was occupied without resistance, the people taking refuge in their ships. The Khan also seized the Genoese property in Sarai. (_Heyd._ II. 27.) [20] “_Stracium et omne capud massariciorum_”; in Scotch phrase “_napery and plenishing_.” A Venetian statute of 1242 prescribes that a bequest of _massariticum_ shall be held to carry to the legatee all articles of common family use except those of gold and silver plate or jeweller’s work. (See _Ducange, sub voce._) _Stracci_ is still used technically in Venice for “household linen.” [21] In the original _aureas libras quinque_. According to Marino Sanudo the Younger (_Vite dei Dogi_ in _Muratori_, xxii. 521) this should be pounds or _lire_ of _aureole_, the name of a silver coin struck by and named after the Doge _Aurio_ Mastropietro (1178–1192): “Ancora fu fatta una Moneta d’argento che si chiamava _Aureola_ per la casata del Doge; _è quella Moneta che i Notai de Venezia mettevano di pena sotto i loro instrumenti_.” But this was a vulgar error. An example of the penalty of 5 pounds of gold is quoted from a decree of 960; and the penalty is sometimes expressed “_auri purissimi librae_ 5.” A coin called the _lira d’oro_ or _redonda_ is alleged to have been in use before the ducat was introduced. (See _Gallicciolli_, II. 16.) But another authority seems to identify the _lira a oro_ with the _lira dei grossi_. (See _Zanetti, Nuova Racc. delle Monete &c. d’Italia_, 1775. I. 308.) [22] We give a photographic reduction of the original document. This, and the other two Polo Wills already quoted, had come into the possession of the Noble Filippo Balbi, and were by him presented in our own time to the St. Mark’s Library. They are all on parchment, in writing of that age, and have been officially examined and declared to be originals. They were first published by _Cicogna, Iscrizioni Veneziane_, III. 489–493. We give Marco’s in the original language, line for line with the facsimile, in _Appendix C_. There is no signature, as may be seen, except those of the Witnesses and the Notary. The sole presence of a Notary was held to make a deed valid, and from about the middle of the 13th century in Italy it is common to find no actual signature (even of witnesses) except that of the Notary. The peculiar flourish before the Notary’s name is what is called the _Tabellionato_, a fanciful distinctive monogram which each Notary adopted. Marco’s Will is unfortunately written in a very cramp hand with many contractions. The other two Wills (of Marco the Elder and Maffeo) are in beautiful and clear Gothic penmanship. [23] We have noticed formerly (pp. _14–15_, _note_) the recent discovery of a document bearing what was supposed to be the autograph signature of our Traveller. The document in question is the Minute of a Resolution of the Great Council, attested by the signatures of three members, of whom the last is MARCUS PAULLO. But the date alone, 11th March, 1324, is sufficient to raise the gravest doubts as to this signature being that of our Marco. And further examination, as I learn from a friend at Venice, has shown that the same name occurs in connection with analogous entries on several subsequent occasions up to the middle of the century. I presume that this Marco Polo is the same that is noticed in our _Appendix B_, II. as a voter in the elections of the Doges Marino Faliero and Giovanni Gradenigo. I have not been able to ascertain his relation to either branch of the Polo family; but I suspect that he belonged to that of S. Geremia, of which there _was_ certainly a Marco about the middle of the century. [24] “Under the _angiporta_ (of S. Lorenzo) [see plate] is buried that Marco Polo surnamed Milione, who wrote the Travels in the New World, and who was the first before Christopher Columbus to discover new countries. No faith was put in him because of the extravagant things that he recounted; but in the days of our Fathers Columbus augmented belief in him, by discovering that part of the world which eminent men had heretofore judged to be uninhabited.” (_Venezia ... Descritta_, etc., f. 23 _v._) Marco Barbaro attests the same inscription in his Genealogies (copy in Museo Civico at Venice). [25] _Cicogna_, II. 385. [26] _Lazari_, xxxi. [27] In the first edition I noticed briefly a statement that had reached me from China that, in the Temple at Canton vulgarly called “of the 500 gods,” there is a foreign figure which from the name attached had been supposed to represent Marco Polo! From what I have heard from Mr. Wylie, a very competent authority, this is nonsense. The temple contains 500 figures of _Arhans_ or Buddhist saints, and one of these attracts attention from having a hat like a sailor’s straw hat. Mr. Wylie had not remarked the name. [A model of this figure was exhibited at Venice at the international Geographical Congress, in 1881. I give a reproduction of this figure and of the Temple of 500 Genii (_Fa Lum Sze_) at Canton, from drawings by Félix Régamey made after photographs sent to me by my late friend, M. Camille Imbault Huart, French Consul at Canton.—H. C.] [28] These documents are noted in Appendix C, Nos. 9–12, 14, 17, 18. [29] I can find no _Ranuzzo_ Dolfino among the Venetian genealogies, but several _Reniers_. And I suspect Ranuzzo may be a form of the latter name. [30] _Cappellari_ (see p. 77, footnote) under _Bragadino_. [31] _Ibid._ and _Gallicciolli_, II. 146. [32] The _lire_ of the fine are not specified; but probably _ai grossi_, which would be = 37_l._ 10_s._; not, we hope, _dei_ grossi! [33] Yet, if the family were so wealthy as tradition represents, it is strange that Marco’s brother Maffeo, _after_ receiving a share of his father’s property, should have possessed barely 10,000 _lire_, probably equivalent to 5000 ducats at most. (See p. _65_, _supra_.) [34] An Agnes Loredano, Abbess of S. Maria delle Vergini, died in 1397. (_Cicogna_, V. 91 and 629.) The interval of 61 years makes it somewhat improbable that it should be the same. [35] In the _Museo Civico_ (No. 2271 of the Cicogna collection) there is a commission addressed by the Doge Michiel Steno in 1408, “_Nobili Viro Marcho Paulo_,” nominating him Podestà of Arostica (a Castello of the Vicentino). This is probably the same Marco. [36] The descent runs: (1) Azzo = Maria Polo; (2) Febo, Captain at Padua; (3) Zaccaria, Senator; (4) Domenico, Procurator of St. Mark’s; (5) Marc’Antonio, Doge (_Cappellari_, _Campidoglio Veneto_, MS. St. Mark’s Lib.). Marc’Antonio _nolebat ducari_ and after election desired to renounce. His friends persuaded him to retain office, but he lived scarcely a year after. (_Cicogna_, IV. 566.) [See p. _8_.] [37] In Appendix B will be found tabulated all the facts that seem to be positively ascertained as to the Polo genealogies. In the Venetian archives occurs a procuration executed by the Doge in favour of the _Nobilis Vir_ SER MARCO PAULO that he may present himself before the king of Sicily; under date, Venice 9th November,