Treatise on Poisons by Sir Robert Christison
CHAPTER I.
1501 words | Chapter 3
ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTION OF POISONS.
I shall discuss this subject by considering first the mode in which
poisons act, and secondly, the causes by which their action is liable to
be modified.
SECTION I.—_On the Mode of Action of Poisons._
On attending to the effects which follow the application of a poison to
the body, we perceive that they are sometimes confined to the part where
it is applied, and at other times extend to distant organs. Hence the
action of poisons may be naturally considered as _local_ and _remote_.
The local effects of poisons are of three kinds. Some decompose
chemically or corrode the part to which they are applied. Others,
without immediately injuring its organization, inflame or irritate it.
Others neither corrode nor irritate, but make a peculiar impression on
the sentient extremities of the nerves, unaccompanied by any visible
change of structure.
We have examples of local _corrosion_ or chemical decomposition in the
effects of the concentrated mineral acids or alkalis on the skin, and in
the effects of strong oxalic acid, lunar caustic, or corrosive sublimate
on the stomach. In all of these instances the part to which the poison
is applied undergoes chemical changes, and the poison itself sometimes
undergoes chemical changes also. Thus oxalic acid dissolves the gelatin
of the animal textures; and in the instance of corrosive sublimate, the
elements of the poison unite with the albumen, fibrin, and other
principles of the tissues.
Of local _irritation_ and its various consequences we have many
examples, from redness, its slightest, to ulceration and gangrene, its
most severe effect. Thus externally, alcohol reddens the skin;
cantharides irritates the surface of the true skin and causes
vesication; tartar-emetic causes deep-seated inflammation of the true
skin and a pustular eruption; the juice of manchineel[1] spreading
inflammation of the subcutaneous cellular tissue; arsenic inflammation
of all these textures, and also death of the part and subsequent
sloughing. Internally, alcohol reddens the stomach, as it does the
skin,—but more permanently; while other substances, such as the diluted
mineral acids, arsenic, cantharides, euphorbium, and the like, may cause
all the phenomena of inflammation in the stomach and intestines, namely,
extravasation of blood, effusion of lymph, ulcers, gangrene. Many of
these irritants, such as arsenic, are in common speech called
corrosives; but they have not any power of causing chemical
decomposition: if they produce a breach in the texture of an organ, it
is merely through the medium of inflammation and its effects.
Of _nervous impressions_, without any visible organic change, few well
authenticated and unequivocal instances are known. A good example has
been mentioned by Sir B. Brodie in the effect of monkshood on the lips
when chewed,[2] an effect which I have also often experienced: it causes
a sense of numbness and tingling in the lips and tongue, lasting for
some hours, and quite unconnected with any affection of the general
nervous system. Another instance, first mentioned to me by M. Robiquet,
and which I have verified, occurs in the effects of the strong
hydrocyanic acid: when this acid is confined in a glass tube with a
finger on its open end, the point of the finger becomes benumbed,
exactly as from the local action of great cold. These are undoubted
instances of a purely nervous local impression on the external surface
of the body. The most unequivocal instance I know of a similar
impression on internal parts is a fact related by Dr. W. Philip with
regard to opium.[3] When this poison was applied to the inner coat of
the intestines of a rabbit during life, the muscular contractions of the
gut were immediately paralyzed, without the general system being for
some time affected. The same effect has been observed by Messrs. Morgan
and Addison to follow the application of ticunas to the intestine:[4] an
instant and complete suspension of the peristaltic movement took place
as soon as it touched the gut. A parallel fact has also been described
by Dr. Monro, _secundus_:[5] when an infusion of opium was injected
between the skin and muscles of the leg of a frog, that leg soon became
palsied, while the animal was able to leap briskly on the other three.
Analogous results have farther been obtained with the prussic acid by M.
Coullon.[6] He remarked, that when one hind-leg of a frog was plunged in
the acid, it became palsied in thirty-five minutes, while the other
hind-leg continued perfectly sensible and irritable. Acetate of lead
probably possesses the same property.
These facts are important, because some physiologists have doubted
whether any local impressions of a purely nervous nature, unconnected
with appreciable organic change, may arise from the action of poisons.
Yet the existence of impressions of the kind is essential to the
stability of the doctrine of the sympathetic operation of poisons,—that
is, of the transmission of their influence from organ to organ along the
nerves. Nay, in the instance of many poisons supposed to act in that
manner, we must still farther believe in the existence of primary
nervous impressions, which are not only unconnected with organic change,
but likewise undistinguishable by any local sign whatsoever.
Of the three varieties in the local effects of poisons—corrosion,
irritation, and nervous impressions,—the first two may take place in any
tissue or organ; for example, they have been observed on the skin, on
the mucous membrane of the stomach, intestines, windpipe, air tubes,
bladder, and vagina, in the cellular tissue, in the serous membranes of
the chest and abdomen, in the muscular fibre. We are not so well
acquainted with the nature of local nervous impressions on different
tissues; but it is probable that in some textures of the body they are
very indistinct.
So much for the local effects of poisons.
On tracing the phenomena which follow more remotely, we observe that the
affected part sometimes recovers without any visible change, sometimes
undergoes the usual processes consequent on inflammation, sometimes
perishes at once and is thrown off; and if the organ is one whose
function is necessary to life, death may gradually ensue, in consequence
of that function being irrecoverably injured. The purest example of the
last train of phenomena is to be seen in the occasional effects of the
mineral acids or alkalis: death may take place simply from starvation,
because the inner surface of the stomach and intestines is so much
injured that a sufficient quantity of nutriment cannot be assimilated.
But death and its antecedents can seldom be accounted for in this way.
For symptoms are often witnessed, which bear no direct relation to the
local injury: death is generally too rapid to have arisen from the
function of the part having been annihilated: and the rapidity of the
poisoning is not proportional in different cases to the local injury
produced. Even the mineral acids and alkalis seldom kill by impeding or
annihilating digestion, because they often prove fatal in a few hours;
and among other poisons there are few which ever cause death simply by
disturbing the function of the part primarily acted on. Death and the
symptoms preceding it arise from an injury of some other organ, to which
they are not and cannot be directly applied. We are thus led to consider
their remote action.
The term _remote_ is here used in preference to the common phrase
_general_ action, because the latter implies an action on the general
system or whole body; whereas it appears that an action of such a kind
is rare, and that most poisons which have an indirect action exert it on
one or more of the important organs only, and not on the general system.
There is not a better instance of the remote action of poisons than
oxalic acid. It has been already mentioned that concentrated oxalic acid
is a corrosive: yet it never kills by destroying the function of the
stomach. Man, as well as the lower animals, will live several days or
weeks without nutriment. Now this poison has been known to kill a man in
ten minutes, and a dog in three minutes only. Neither does it always
induce, when swallowed, symptoms of an injury of the stomach; for death
is often preceded by tetanus, or apoplexy, or mortal faintness. Nor is
the violence of the poisoning proportional to the extent of the local
injury: in fact, death is most rapid under circumstances in which the
stomach is least injured, namely, when the acid is considerably
diluted.[7]
Let us now proceed to enquire, then, in what way the influence of a
poison is conveyed from one organ to another.
Here it will at once be perceived that the conveyance can be
accomplished in one of two ways only. Either the local impression passes
along the nerves to the organ secondarily affected; or the poison enters
the bibulous vessels, mingles with the blood, and passes through the
medium of the circulation. In the former way poisons are said to act
through _sympathy_, in the latter, through _absorption_.
Reading Tips
Use arrow keys to navigate
Press 'N' for next chapter
Press 'P' for previous chapter