Galen: On the Natural Faculties by Galen
Introduction, p. xxxiv.
557 words | Chapter 52
[216] Observe that Erasistratus's "simple nerve" may be
almost looked on as an anticipation of the _cell_. The
question Galen now asks is whether this vessel is a
"unit mass of living matter," or merely an agglomeration
of _atoms_ subject to mechanical law. _cf._ Galen's
"fibres," p. 329.
[217] _cf._ Book I., chap. xii.
[218] _i.e._ in biology we must begin with living
substance--with something which is specifically
alive--here with the "unit mass of living matter." _cf._
p. 73, note 3 (119).
[219] "Ad elementa quae nec coalescere possunt nec in
partes dividi" (Linacre). On the two contrasted schools
_cf._ p. 45.
[220] _cf._ _loc. cit._
[221] "_Auxetic._" _cf._ p. 26, note 1 (50).
[222] "At corporum quae nec una committi nec dividi
possunt nullum in se formatricem, auctricem, nutricem,
aut in summa artificem facultatem habet; quippe quod
impatibile esse immutibileque praesumitur" (Linacre).
[223] Book I., chaps. v.-xi.
[224] _cf._ p. 153.
[225] On account of his idea of a simple tissue not
susceptible of further analysis.
[226] Or "cell"; _cf._ p. 153, note 2 (216).
[227] The _horror vacui_.
[228] _Prosthesis_ of nutriment; _cf._ p. 39, note 6
(67).
[229] _Anadosis_, "absorption"; _cf._ p. 13, note 5
(26).
[230] Lit. _diadosis_.
[231] _i.e._ let him explain the _diadosis_.
[232] "Spiritus animalis"; _cf._ p. 152, note 1 (215).
The nutriment was for the _walls_ of the vessels, not
for their cavities. _cf._ p. 319, note 3 (394).
[233] Specific attraction; _cf._ Book I., chap. xiv.
[234] _cf._ p. 100, note 2 (152).
[235] In Book II., chap. i.
[236] Prevention better than cure.
[237] _e.g._ Anaxagoras; _cf._ p. 7, note 5 (14); p. 20,
note 3 (38).
[238] Lit. _haematosis_.
[239] _cf._ p. 174, note 4 (250).
[240] Erasistratus held the spleen to be useless, _cf._
p. 143.
[241] Induration: Gk. _skirros_, Lat. _scirrhus_. The
condition is now commonly known by Laënnec's term
_cirrhosis_, from Gk. _kirros_, meaning yellow or tawny.
Here again we have an example of Erasistratus's bias
towards anatomical or structural rather than functional
explanations of disease, _cf._ p. 124, note 1 (180).
[242] On the risks which were supposed to attend the
checking of habitual bleeding from piles _cf._ Celsus
(_De Re Med._ VI. xviii. 9), "Atque in quibusdam parum
tuto supprimitur, qui sanguinis profluvio imbecilliores
non fiunt; habent enim purgationem hanc, non morbum."
(_i.e._ the habit was to be looked on as a periodical
cleansing, not as a disease.)
[243] Lit. _catharsis_.
[244] Apparently some form of anaemia.
[245] Philistion of Locri, a contemporary of Plato, was
one of the chief representatives of the Sicilian school
of medicine. For Diocles and Praxagoras see p. 51, note
1 (83).
[246] _cf._ Book I., chap. iii.
[247] Gk. _pepsis_; otherwise rendered _coction_.
[248] _cf._ p. 13, note 5 (26).
[249] _e.g._ Asclepiades.
[250] Lit. _chylosis_; _cf._ p. 238, note 2 (312).
[251] That is to say, the haematopoietic function
deserves consideration as much as the digestive
processes which precede it.
[252] _i.e._ Erasistratus could obviously say nothing
about any of the humours or their origins, since he had
not postulated the four qualities (particularly the
Warm--that is, innate heat).
[253] _i.e._ bile.
[254] _i.e._ deprived of its bile.
[255] Here it is rather the living organism we consider
than the particular food that is put into it.
[256] Supreme importance of the "soil." _cf._
Reading Tips
Use arrow keys to navigate
Press 'N' for next chapter
Press 'P' for previous chapter