A History of Epidemics in Britain, Volume 1 (of 2) by Charles Creighton
220. The late Rev. S. S. Lewis, fellow and librarian of the College, who
2138 words | Chapter 90
most liberally had a fac-simile of the drawing made for me, would date it
a little before 1250. (Rolls edition, by Luard, II. 144.)
[170] _Rotuli Chartarum_, 1199-1216. Charter of confirmation, 1204 (5
Joh.) p. 117 b.
[171] In the _Valor Ecclesiasticus_ of Henry VIII. its revenue is put at
£100.
[172] The commanderies of the Knights of St Lazarus were numerous in every
province of France. For an enumeration of them see _Les Lepreux et les
Chevaliers de Saint Lazare de Jerusalem et de Notre Dame et de Mont
Carmel_. Par Eugene Vignat, Orleans, 1884, pp. 315-364.
[173] _Joannis Sarisburiensis Opera omnia_, ed. Giles 1, 141 (letter to
Josselin, bishop of Salisbury).
[174] “Vix seu raro inveniuntur tot leprosi volentes vitam ducere
observantiis obligatam ad dictum hospitale concurrentes.” Walsingham,
_Gesta Abbatum_, Rolls ed. II. 484.
[175] Matthew Paris, _Chron. Maj._ V. 452.
[176] Walsingham, _Gesta Abbatum_, II. 401.
[177] “The sisters of St James’s were bound by no vows, and at this period
[1344] were not all, or even any of them, lepers; and in consequence a
place in the hospital was much sought after by needy dependents of the
Court.” Report on MSS. of the Dean and Chapter of Canterbury, in _Hist.
MSS. Commission Reports_, IX. p. 87.
[178] Dugdale’s _History of Warwickshire_, p. 197.
[179] On Nov. 24, 1200, king John signed at Lincoln letters of simple
protection to the _leprosi_ of St Bartholomew’s, Oxford (_Rot. Chart.
1199-1216_, p. 99).
[180] _Rotuli Hundredorum_, II. 359-60. The famous Stourbridge Fair
originally grew out of a right of market-toll granted in aid of the
leper-hospital.
[181] The decrees of the Third Lateran Council are given by several
historians of the time, among others by William of Newburgh, pp. 206-223.
[182] Roger of Howden, Rolls edition, II. 265.
[183] William of Newburgh, Rolls edition, p. 437.
[184] See the various charters and memorials in Surtees’ _History of
Durham_.
[185] Two of the larger houses for lepers not mentioned in the text were
St Nicholas’s at Carlisle and the hospital at Bolton in Northumberland,
each with thirteen beds.
[186] By collecting every reference to lepers or lazar-houses in Tanner’s
_Notitia Monastica_ or in Dugdale’s _Monasticon_ Sir J. Y. Simpson has
made out a table of some hundred leper-houses in Britain (_Edin. Med. and
Surg. Journ._ 1841 and 1842). Simpson’s table has been added to by Miss
Lambert in the _Nineteenth Century_, Aug.-Sept. 1884, by the Rev. H. P.
Wright (_Leprosy_ etc. 1885), who says at the end of his long list: “There
were hundreds more,” and by Mr R. C. Hope (_The Leper in England_,
Scarborough, 1891), whose list runs to 172.
Perhaps the most remarkable development of that verbalist handling of the
matter has been reserved for a recent medical writer, who has constructed,
from the conventional list of leper-hospitals, a map of the _geographical
distribution of leprosy_ in medieval Britain. (_British Medical Journal_,
March 1, 1890, p. 466.)
[187] The Lock was doubtless the house of the “Leprosi apud Bermondsey”
who are designated in the Royal Charter of 1 Hen. IV. (1399) as
recipients, along with the _leprosi_ of Westminster (St James’s), of “five
or six thousand pounds.” (_Rotuli Chartarum_, 1 Hen. IV.)
[188] Beckett, _Phil. Trans._, vol. 31, p. 60.
[189] Stow, _Survey of London_, ed. of 1890, p. 437.
[190] Beckett, _l. c._ The Knightsbridge house was earlier. See next note.
[191] _Survey of London_, pop. ed. p. 436. Bequests to lepers occur in
various wills of London citizens, in Dr Sharpe’s _Calendar of Wills_, vol.
II. Lond. 1890. In a will dated 21 April, 1349, the bequest is to “the
poor lazars without Southwerkebarre and at Hakeney” (p. 3). On 1 July,
1371, another bequeaths money to “the three colleges of lepers near
London, viz. at _le loke_, at St Giles de Holbourne, and at Hakeney” (p.
147). On 7 April, 1396, bequests are made to “the lepers at le loke near
Seynt Georges barre, of St Giles without Holbournebarre, and le meselcotes
de Haconey” (p. 341). The “lazar house at Knyghtbrigge” appears, for the
first time, in a will dated 21 Feb. 1485, along with “the sick people in
the lazercotes next about London” (p. 589).
[192] _Accounts of the Lord High-Treasurer of Scotland._ Rolls series I.
1473-1498, pp. 337, 356, 361, 378, 386.
[193] These are all the so-called “medieval leper-hospitals” collected by
Belcher (_Dubl. Quart. Journ. of Med. Sc._ 1868, August, p. 36) chiefly
from Archdall’s _Monasticon Hibernicum_. He points out that the very early
references to leprosy in the _Annals of the Four Masters_ included various
kinds of cutaneous maladies.
[194] _Chronicon Abbatiae Rameseiensis._ Rolls series, 1886, p. 157. The
chronicler has nothing farther to say as to the cause of the leprosy, than
the opinion of “a certain philosopher,” that whatever turns us from health
to the vices of disease acts by the weight of too much blood, by
superfluous heat, by humours exuding in excess, or by the spirits flowing
with unwonted laxity through silent passages.
[195] Eadmer, _Vita S. Anselmi_, Rolls edit., p. 355.
[196] Walsingham, _Gesta Abbatum_, Rolls edit. II. Appendix C. p. 503.
[197] Brassac, Art. “Éléphantiasis,” in _Dict. Encycl. des Sc. Méd._ p.
475, says: “Il y avait aussi des vagabonds et des paresseux qui, sans
nulle crainte de la contagion, et désireux de vivre sans rien faire,
simulaient la lèpre pour être admis aux léproseries. On y trouvait encore
des personnes qui s’imposaient une réclusion perpétuelle pour vivre avec
les lépreux et faire leur salut par une vie de soumission aux règles de
l’Église.”
[198] The ordinance is translated in full from the City archives by H. T.
Riley, _London in the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries_, pp.
230-231. The following is the preamble of it:--
“Edward, by the grace of God, etc. Forasmuch as we have been given to
understand that many persons, as well of the city aforesaid as others
coming to the said city, being smitten with the blemish of leprosy, do
publicly dwell among the other citizens and sound persons, and there
continually abide and do not hesitate to communicate with them, as well in
public places as in private; and that some of them, endeavouring to
contaminate others with that abominable blemish (that so, to their own
wretched solace, they may have the more fellows in suffering,) as well in
the way of mutual communications, and by the contagion of their polluted
breath, as by carnal intercourse with women in stews and other secret
places, detestably frequenting the same, do so taint persons who are
sound, both male and female, to the great injury of the people dwelling in
the city aforesaid, and the manifest peril of other persons to the same
city resorting:--We” etc.
[199] Riley, p. 384.
[200] _Dialogue of the Fever Pestilence._ Early Eng. Text Soc.
[201] Riley, p. 365.
[202] Rymer’s _Foedera_, v. pt. 2, p. 166.
[203] Wharton’s _Anglia Sacra_, 11. Praef. p. 32.
[204] The expression “leprosa Sodomorum” occurs in a Latin poem from a
medieval MS. found in Switzerland. The verses are printed in full by
Hensler, _Geschichte der Lustseuche_, p. 307.
[205] These and other particulars relating to lepers in Scotland are given
in Simpson’s _Antiquarian Notices of Leprosy in Scotland and England_
(_Edin. Med. and Surg. Journ._ Oct. 1841, Jan. and April 1842), a series
of excellent papers which have been for many years the source of most that
has been written of medieval leprosy in this country.
[206] Letter to Barrington, 8 January, 1778.
[207] These numbers seem to stand for the contents of the larders in all
the various manors of De Spenser.
[208] Mr Jonathan Hutchinson has been adding, year after year, to the
evidence that semi-putrid fish, eaten in that state by preference or of
necessity, is the chief cause of modern leprosy, and he has successfully
met many of the apparent exceptions. Norway has had leprosy in some
provinces for centuries; and it is significant that William of Malmesbury,
referring to those who went on the first Crusade, says: “Scotus
familiaritatem pulicum reliquit, Noricus cruditatem piscium.” (_Gesta
Regum_, Eng. Hist. Soc. II. 533.)
[209] In his section _De preservatione a lepra_ (p. 345) Gilbert advises
to avoid, among other things, all salted fish and meat, and dried bacon.
[210] Acts of Robert III. in the _Regiam Majestatem_, p. 414 (quoted by
Simpson, _Ed. Med. and Surg. Journ._ vol. 57, p. 416).
[211] Dr Gilbert Skene, of Aberdeen, and afterwards of Edinburgh, in his
book on the plague (1568), has an incidental remark about “evil and
corrupt meats” which may be taken in a literal sense: “As we see dailie
the pure man subject to sic calamitie nor the potent, quha are constrynit
be povertie to eit evill and corrupte meittis, and diseis is contractit,
heir of us callit pandemiall.” (Bannatyne Club edition, p. 6.)
[212] Higden’s _Polychronicon_. Edited for the Rolls series by Babington
and Lumby, vol. VIII.
[213] _The Annals of Ireland._ By Friar John Clyn, of the Convent of
Friars Minor, Kilkenny, and Thady Dowling, Chancellor of Leighlin. Edited
from the MSS. etc. by R. Butler, Dean of Clonmacnois. Dublin, 1849 (Irish
Archæological Society). The last entry by Clyn himself appears to be the
words “magna karistia” etc., under 1349. There is added “Videtur quod
author hic obiit;” and then two entries of pestilence made in 1375 in
another hand.
[214] Henricus de Knighton, _Chronicon Angliae_, in Twysden’s _Decem
Script. Angl._ col. 2598 _et seq._ An edition of Knighton’s _Chronicle_,
by Lumby, is in progress for the Rolls series.
[215] _Chronicle of Geoffrey le Baker._ Edited by E. Maunde Thompson,
Oxford, 1889.
[216] Robertus de Avesbury, _Historia de Mirabilibus Gestis Regis Ed.
III._, Oxon. 1720. Also in the Rolls series. Edited by E. Maunde Thompson.
[217] _Eulogium Historiarum._ Rolls series, No. 9. Edited by Haydon, III.
213.
[218] _Itineraria Symonis Simeonis et Willelmi de Worcestre._ Edited by
Nasmith from the MSS. in the library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge.
Cantab. 1778, p. 113: “parum ante nativitatem Domini intravit villam
Bodminiae, ubi mortui fuerunt circa mille quingentos per estimacionem.”
[219] Histor. MSS. Commission, vi. 475.
[220] Wilkins, _Concilia_ II. 745: “Contagium pestilentiae moderni
temporis undique se dilatans etc.”
[221] Rymer’s _Foedera_, V. 655:--“Quia tamen subita plaga Pestilentiae
Mortalis in loco praedicto et aliis partibus circumvicinis adeo indies
invalescit, quod de securo accessu Hominum ad locum illum formidatur
admodum hiis diebus.”
[222] _Ibid._--“Et quia dicta Pestilentia Mortalis in dicto loco
Westmonasteriensi ac in civitate Londoniae, ac alis locis circumvicinis,
gravius solito invalescit (quod dolenter referimus) per quod accessus
Magnatum et aliorum nostrorum Fidelium ad dictum locum nimis periculosus
foret,” &c. This second prorogation was _sine die_.
[223] _Calendar of Wills_ (Husting Court, London), ed. Sharpe, Lond. 1889,
I. 506-624.
[224] Clyn. But his account for Kilkenny, where he lived, makes the
epidemic either earlier or later there than at Dublin: “Ista pestilencia
apud Kilkenniam in XL{a} invaluit; nam VIto die Marcii viii fratres
predicatores infra diem Natalem obierunt,” the Lent referred to being
either that of 1349 or of 1350. The difficulty about assigning the landing
of the infection near Dublin in the beginning of August to the year 1348
is that the English importation had only then taken place. But of course
Ireland may have got it direct from abroad.
[225] _Op. cit._ p. 98: “Torserunt illos apostemata e diversis partibus
corporis subito irrumpencia, tam dura et sicca quod ab illis decisis vix
liquor emanavit; a quibus multi per incisionem aut per longam pacienciam
evaserunt. Alii habuerunt pustulos parvos nigros per totam corporis cutem
conspersos, a quibus paucissimi, immo vix aliquis, vitæ et sanitati
resilierunt.”
[226] “Nam multi ex anthrace et ex apostematibus, et pustulis quae
creverunt in tibiis et sub asellis, alii ex passione capitis, et quasi in
frenesim versi, alii spuendo sanguinem, moriebantur,” p. 36.
[227] _A Treatise faithfully and plainely declaring the way of preventing,
preserving from and curing that most fearfull I and contagious disease
called the Plague. With the Pestilential Feaver and other the fearful
symptomes and accidents incident thereto._ By John Woodall, surgeon to St
Bartholomew’s Hospital, &c. London, 1639.
[228] Robertus de Avesbury, Rolls ed., p. 177.
[229] _Eulogium Historiarum._ Rolls ser. No. 9, III. 213.
[230] Rymer’s _Foedera_, V. 668.
[231] “Pro quorum defectu [referring to the fugitive villeins] mulieres et
parvuli invise missi sunt ad carucas et ad plaustra fuganda.” _Eulogium._
Rolls ed. III. 214.
[232] Nichols, _History Of Leicestershire_, I. 534.
[233] Nichols, _l. c._
[234] For a series of years the burials in the St Martin’s register are as
follow:
1610 82
1611 128
1612 39
1613 25
1614 34
1615 60
1616 41
1617 31
1618 37
1619 28
1620 25
1621 43
1622 27
1623 37
1624 24.
[235] _History and Antiquities of the University of Oxford._ Ed. Gutch I.
Reading Tips
Use arrow keys to navigate
Press 'N' for next chapter
Press 'P' for previous chapter