Accounting theory and practice, Volume 2 (of 3) : a textbook for colleges and…
6. Claims against absconding officers for property
726 words | Chapter 79
appropriated or trusts violated.
It is necessary, therefore, to employ a term of more definite meaning
which cannot be misused. The word “Customer” is sometimes used and is
not objectionable. However, the term “Trade Debtors” is more generally
employed and will be so used here as denoting all claims against
customers, clients, etc., in regular course of business. Its appearance
in a balance sheet is usually evidence of a careful discrimination
among the various classes of claims and is not therefore a misleading
term.
Risk from Credit Losses
As stated above, the chief problem in valuing accounts and notes
receivable is that of estimating bad debts. It is a matter of general
experience that some of those to whom credit is extended do not pay
their bills. Hence, at the close of the fiscal period it is necessary,
so as not to overstate the asset, to estimate the amount which
probably cannot be collected. The necessity for this is recognized in
a decision of the United States Supreme Court in Providence Rubber Co.
v. Goodyear, 9 Wall. 788, and has the sanction of conservative business
policy.
The effect of such an estimate is that the period in which the sale is
effected is made to stand the loss, and not the one in which failure to
secure collection is experienced. There is a close relationship between
the actual loss from bad debts and the credit policy of a concern.
Where the sales force is allowed to grant credit, the loss from bad
debts is almost invariably large. Where the extension of credit is
controlled by a credit department, the loss is less than in the other
case but depends on thoroughness of information and investigation
of the risk. However much care may be exercised, there will be
nevertheless some loss, but a live credit supervision should keep the
loss at a minimum.
Risk and Length of Credit Period
The amount of loss, or rather the percentage of loss, is not the same
for different lines of business nor even for different concerns in
the same line. The normal credit period for a particular business has
some relation to the loss. Thus if credit supervision and collection
effort are the same for two concerns, the one with the shorter credit
period will usually have the smaller loss. In a business, for example,
where the credit term is 60 days, we would expect fewer uncollectible
accounts than in one whose credit period extends for a year or more. As
between two concerns in the same line of business, _where conditions
are fairly uniform_, however, there should be little variation in the
loss from bad debts. As pointed out in Volume I, Chapter XXXVI, the
sales discount policy is for the most part a device for overcoming the
element of risk in the extension of credit.
Analysis of Customers’ Accounts as the Basis for Estimate of Bad Debts
In estimating the amount of bad debts, experience within the particular
business is the only safe guide. Oftentimes, however, the manager or
proprietor is not the most competent person for the task. The auditor,
in consultation with the manager, may often arrive at a better estimate
than could someone closely connected with the business. In making the
estimate, it is an aid to analyze the accounts according to the length
of time they are past due. Thus, there would be, after analysis, the
amount of those overdue not more than 30 days, the amount of those
overdue not more than 60 days, the amount of the 60 to 90 days overdue
items, those 90 days to six months, those six months to a year, and
all those more than a year overdue. The total amount outstanding minus
the sum of these overdue classes represents the portion not yet due.
Some part of the not-yet-due portion is, of course, still subject to
discount if paid within the discount term. With the claims against
customers thus analyzed, a much better basis is afforded for testing
the adequacy of the provision for bad debts. The various methods of
estimating this provision are discussed on page 219.
It may here be noted that when making up the estimate of bad debts it
is by no means always necessary to analyze the outstanding items as
suggested above. Such an analysis is of value in three cases:
Reading Tips
Use arrow keys to navigate
Press 'N' for next chapter
Press 'P' for previous chapter