Accounting theory and practice, Volume 2 (of 3) : a textbook for colleges and…
CHAPTER XIX
1190 words | Chapter 110
LIABILITIES ON THE BALANCE SHEET; CURRENT AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Form and Valuation
The problem of handling liabilities on the balance sheet is usually not
so complicated as that of assets. The questions of arrangement, form,
groups, and suitable nomenclature have in the case of liabilities an
equal or even greater importance than that of the assets, the governing
principle being clearness and fullness in the information given, with
due regard to the purpose and intended use of the balance sheet.
The problem of valuation, which assumes great importance in the
treatment of the assets, has normally little or no significance in
the consideration of liabilities. This is due to several causes. In
the first place, human nature being what it is, there is normally
little danger of an overstatement of liabilities; they are usually
sufficiently large, and no desire exists to make them appear more than
they really are. Secondly, and likewise based on human frailty, while
a concern may desire to undervalue its liabilities, the other party to
the liability, the person holding the claim, can usually be depended
upon to press his claim with sufficient insistence as to make the
concern aware at all times of the amount of its liabilities.
From the viewpoint of a going concern, while all business experience
points to a decrease and a necessary diminution in the values at which
certain assets may appear on the books, no such diminution in the
value of liabilities can be looked for; as legitimate claims must be
met if a business is to exist as a _going_ concern. Similarly, there
is normally no tendency to inflate the liabilities by the inclusion
of items which do not rank fully in this class—intangible liabilities
seldom find place in any balance sheet.
On the other hand, there is frequently a very real hesitancy about the
inclusion of some liability items until their claim becomes urgent
or their full liability status becomes determined. Occasionally, and
usually with ulterior intent, the liabilities may be inflated in value
and items included therein which are fictitious; but our present
concern is not with such conditions.
The one principle underlying the showing of both assets and liabilities
is that their _true_ status should be indicated. As applied to
liabilities this means that they should be shown not only in correct
amount but also in their true light, viz.: that all facts bearing
on their relation to the business which ought to be known properly
to judge conditions must be stated. The chief problem in handling
liabilities is, therefore, how to show and list them so as to
accomplish this purpose of truth and usually the further purpose of
full truth. In a consideration of this problem, the auxiliary one of
the inclusion of doubtful items among the liabilities will also receive
consideration.
Arrangement on Balance Sheet
As to the classification and arrangement of liabilities on the balance
sheet, it may be stated in a general way that whatever classification
and arrangement are adopted for the assets, the liabilities should
be shown similarly. For most purposes a standard grouping under the
captions, Current, Deferred Income, Fixed or Funded, will suffice.
The order of the groups as given here follows the order given for the
assets. This is desirable for purposes of easy comparison, because in
this way current liabilities are brought into juxtaposition with the
group of assets to which current creditors must look for payment of
their claims; and fixed liabilities and capital are opposed to the
assets in which for the most part they have been invested.
Items within Groups
Arrangement within the group may be attempted on the basis of relative
degree of liquidity of the items. This, however, is not always
determinable nor is it an end to be sought; the chief desideratum is to
show items in the main group to which they properly belong.
The manner of listing the items within the group is not a question
of relative order so much as it is of nomenclature and clearness of
expression. Thus, desirable and valuable information would be given by
a separation of the items to show (1) those past due; (2) those due but
not payable because of their credit term; (3) those neither due nor
payable, such as accruing items; and (4) contingent liabilities.[48] It
may be remarked that such an analysis is seldom seen on the ordinary
balance sheet. Corporations which have to report to a regulating body
may be required to give more information concerning their business than
those not so regulated. For internal use the suggested analysis has
undoubted merit. For public use, it is neither necessary nor usually
desirable that the information be given in that form; a showing of the
items under the usual titles within the group to which they properly
belong being here deemed sufficient.
[48] P. J. Esquerré, in “Applied Theory of Accounts.”
Cancellation of Liabilities against Assets
Occasionally the practice is met of cancelling the liabilities, or
some group of them, against corresponding assets, showing only the net
assets remaining. Thus, Current Assets less Current Claims might appear
as an item among the assets. Even for publication purposes this would
not be deemed sufficient; for the outsider as a prospective creditor or
investor has a right to judge for himself the relative sufficiency of
the assets to meet the claims of creditors. No basis for such judgment
is offered by a cancellation of the one against the other with a
showing of the net amount only. A somewhat analogous situation arises
in the double-account form of statement used by some English companies.
Here, the capital assets are canceled against the capital and fixed
liabilities and only the net surplus—usually of capital—appears in
the balance sheet proper. The criticism is not so pertinent here,
however, because almost invariably the balance sheet is accompanied
by the so-called capital account which shows the full detail of the
net item in the balance sheet. So also, the practice is often condoned
wherever an accompanying schedule shows the full facts as to assets and
liabilities. As a matter of principle, it should be condemned because
accompanying schedules do not always “accompany.”
Inventory of Liabilities
The principle of showing the full truth as to the liabilities raises
the problem of the complete inclusion or inventory of the liabilities.
Under this will be considered any adjustments that must be made in the
book record in order to show the true state of the liabilities, and
also the proper treatment of contingent liabilities so as to show their
relation to the state of the business.
The adjustment of the book record is not usually complicated. The
necessary data are for the most part available. All that is required
is an analysis of each item to determine what, if any, adjustment is
needed to bring the books to a true statement of conditions as on the
date of the balance sheet. These adjustments fall into six main groups,
only two of which appear among the liabilities, while one of the others
is often based on information obtainable only from an analysis of the
liabilities. These groups are:
Reading Tips
Use arrow keys to navigate
Press 'N' for next chapter
Press 'P' for previous chapter