A History of Epidemics in Britain, Volume 2 (of 2) by Charles Creighton
1776. _An Introduction to the Plan of the Inoculation Dispensary._ 1778.
1270 words | Chapter 98
_Remarks on Dr Lettsom’s letter to Barker and Stacpoole._ 1779.
[951] Lettsom, _Obs. on Baron Dimsdale’s Remarks, &c._ 1779; and other
pamphlets on both sides.
[952] Clark, _Report of the Newcastle Dispensary_. 1789.
[953] Currie to Haygarth, 28 Nov. 1791, in _Sketch of a Plan, etc._, pp.
451, 207.
[954] J. C. Jenner, “An Account of a General Inoculation at Painswick.”
_Lond. Med. Journ._ VII. 163-8.
[955] _Gent. Magaz._ April, 1788, reported by the Hon. and Rev. Mr Stuart,
who was a grandson of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu.
[956] Monro, _Account of Inoculation in Scotland_, 1765; in his _Works_.
Edin. 1781, p. 693.
[957] _Statistical Account of Scotland._ 1791-99, III. 376.
[958] _Ibid._ IV. 130. It was about the year 1782 that the College of
Physicians of Edinburgh appointed a committee to inquire into the mode of
conducting the gratis inoculations of the poor, which had been tried at
Chester, Leeds, Liverpool, &c. in 1781-82. Haygarth, u. s. 1784, p. 207.
[959] _Ibid._ III. 582.
[960] _Ibid._ XX. 502-7.
[961] _Ibid._ XX. 348. Account by Rev. Abercromby Gordon, who gives in a
note (p. 349) the following instance of professional zeal: “A surgeon in
the north, presuming that self-interest has a stronger hold on man than
superstition, has lately opened a policy of insurance for the smallpox! If
a subscriber gives him two guineas for inoculating his child, the surgeon
in the event of the child’s death pays ten guineas to the parent; for
every guinea subscribed, four guineas, for half a guinea, two guineas, and
for a crown one guinea.”
[962] James Lucas, _Lond. Med. Journ._ X. 269.
[963] Currie to Haygarth, 28 Nov. 1791, in the latter’s _Sketch of a Plan,
&c._ p. 453.
[964] _A Conscious View of Circumstances and Proceedings respecting
Vaccine Inoculation._ Bath, 1800. The author was probably James Nooth,
senior surgeon to the Bath Hospital, who removed to London and practised
in Queen Anne Street, holding the appointment of surgeon to the Duke of
Kent. He wrote on cancer of the breast.
[965] _Tracts on Inoculation._ London, 1781.
[966] R. Pulteney, M.D., in a letter of 21 June, 1766, to Dr G. Baker,
given in his _Inquiry into the Merits of a Method of Inoculating the
Smallpox_. Lond. 1766.
[967] Pulteney, “Births, Deaths and Marriages of Blandford Forum,
1733-1772.” _Phil. Trans._ LXVIII. 615.
[968] Pulteney to Baker, App. to _Inquiry into the method of Inoculating_.
1766; Hutchins, _Dorsetshire_, I. 217.
[969] On 23 July, 1785, the apothecary makes a note in his book: “Some
inspectors are not sufficiently careful to send information to the
Hospital when children have had the smallpox.” MS. Records.
[970] _Experiments, &c._ 1768.
[971] Sir W. Watson, M.D., F.R.S., “On the Putrid Measles of London, 1763
and 1768.” _Med. Obs. and Inquiries_, IV. 153.
[972] Charles Kite, surgeon, Gravesend, “An Account of some anomalous
Appearances consequent to Inoculation of Smallpox.” _Memoirs Med. Soc.
Lond._ IV. (1794), p. 114.
[973] Fosbroke, _Lond. Med. Repository_. June, 1819, p. 466.
[974] Jenner to James Moore, in Baron’s _Life of Jenner_, II. 401: “Is not
that a precious anecdote for your new work?” See also _Court and Private
Life of Queen Charlotte_ (Journals of Mrs Papendiek). Lond. 1887, I. 41,
70, 270.
[975] In Baron, u. s.
[976] _A Conscious View, &c._ u. s.
[977] Earle, in Jenner’s _Further Observations_. 1799.
[978] T. Adams to Richard Pew, M.D., of Sherborne. _Lond. Med. and Phys.
Journ._ April, 1829.
[979] John Forbes, M.D., “Some Account of the Smallpox lately prevalent in
Chichester and its vicinity.” _Lond. Med. Reposit._ Sept. 1822, p. 218.
[980] _Discourse on Inoculation._ Eng. Transl. 1755.
[981] _A Series of Experiments, &c._ 1768.
[982] John Haygarth, M.B., _Inquiry how to prevent the Smallpox_. Chester,
1784, p. 154.
[983] _History of Inoculation in Britain._ Vol. I. London, 1796, p. 33.
[984] _History of Edinburgh._ Edin. 1779, p. 260.
[985] W. Hillary, _Rational and mechanical Essay on the Smallpox_. Lond.
1735.
[986] J. Barker, _The Nature of Inoculation explained and its Merits
stated_. London, 1769, p. 33. He taught that a depraved habit, by ill
diet, &c., “serves for a nidus wherein the variolous matter rests.” If the
variolous matter to be expelled is small, “by reason of natural health,
temperance, or the power of preparation,” the disease is of the distinct
kind; when large, of the confluent. “And wise indeed must he be who can
find out any laws respecting the reception and expulsion of diseases
superior on the whole to those which are original.” p. 9.
[987] “I have taken an account in this town [Halifax], and some parts of
the country, and have procured the same from several other towns
hereabouts, where the smallpox has been epidemical this last year, with as
much exactness as was possible.” _Phil. Trans._ XXXII. 211.
[988] “A small neighbouring market town.”
[989] “More than usually mortal.”
[990] “A small market town in Lancashire, including two neighbouring
villages.”
[991] Account taken “by a person of credit” and sent to Dr Whitaker. Jurin
says, more generally: “Taken in several places by a careful enquiry from
house to house.” _Account, &c._ 1724, p. 7.
[992] “At Uxbridge and in the neighbourhood, the smallpox having been
exceedingly fatal all thereabouts.”
[993] _Mr Maitland’s Account of Inoculating the Smallpox vindicated._ 2nd
ed. Lond. 1722.
[994] _Phil. Trans._ XXXIII. 379. “A short account of the Anomalous
Epidemic Smallpox beginning at Plymouth in August, 1724, and continuing to
the month of June, 1725, By the learned and ingenious Dr Huxham, physician
at Plymouth.”
[995] The totals are given in Jurin’s _Account_ for 1725. The ages are in
the original communication of the Rev. Mr Wasse, among the MS. papers
which Jurin had deposited with the Royal Society.
[996] The most singular thing in the Aynho experience is that there should
have been no cases in infants under two years. It was observed, however,
some two generations after this, that smallpox attacked children at the
earliest ages in the great towns (Haygarth, _Sketch of a Plan, &c._, 1793,
p. 31), and even in the worst conditions of infancy it has attacked
relatively few in the first three months of life. Again, it is nearly as
remarkable that there should have been only three cases at Aynho in the
third year of life and only four in the fourth. However, the fewness of
cases in the five first years of life must be taken as exceptional, even
for a village epidemic. If Nettleton, who made the first of these censuses
of smallpox epidemics and suggested to Jurin that they should be carried
out elsewhere, had given the ages, he would certainly have included some
in infancy, for he mentions, in the course of his inoculation experiences,
particular cases at nine months, eighteen months, etc.
[997] Frewen, _Phil. Trans._ XXXVII. 108.
[998] See above, pp. 485-6 and 490-1.
[999] Deering, _Nottingham vetus et nova_. 1751, pp. 78, 82. He says, in
an essay on smallpox (_Improved Method of treating Smallpox._ Nottingham,
1737) that he treated fifty-one cases in the epidemic of 1736, of which
only three proved fatal.
[1000] _Gent. Magaz._ 1741, p. 704.
[1001] Alex. Monro, primus, in his Report to the Dean of the Faculty of
Medicine of Paris on Inoculation in Scotland, 1765. Reprinted in his
_Works_. Edin. 1781, p. 485. He does not give ages, but an inspection of
the burial registers is said to show that they were nearly all under five.
[1002] _Gent. Magaz._ 1742, p. 704. Blomefield gives 1710 and 1731 as
great smallpox years in Norwich.
[1003] _Ibid._ 1747, p. 623. The population of Northampton in 1746 was
Reading Tips
Use arrow keys to navigate
Press 'N' for next chapter
Press 'P' for previous chapter