Waterways and Water Transport in Different Countries by J. Stephen Jeans

CHAPTER IV.

4177 words  |  Chapter 61

THE WATERWAYS OF SCOTLAND. “Former things Are set aside, like abdicated kings.” —_Ovid._ Scotland has a number of rivers of the first importance, especially the Clyde, the Tay, the Dee, and the Tweed. It has a large number of smaller streams, most of them, however, having too tortuous a course, too impetuous a flow, or too shallow a bed, to be used to any extent for purposes of navigation. This remark does not, of course, apply to the numerous lakes or lochs of Scotland, but these are, for the most part, either situated in inaccessible regions, or in localities where there is not trade enough to provide any considerable amount of traffic. The Clyde is pre-eminently distinguished for the extent of its traffic, and for the improvements that have made it what it is. Camden does not say much as to the condition of the Clyde in his time, and he is almost equally reticent about Glasgow. “The river Glotta or Clwyd,” he says, “runneth from Hamilton, by Bothwell ... and so straight forward, with a readie stream, through Glasgow, in ancient times past a Bishop’s seat ... now the most famous town of merchandise in this tract.” In Camden’s time the other qualifications of Glasgow appear to have been that it had “a pleasant site, and apple trees, and other like fruit trees, much commended, having also a very fine bridge supported with eight arches.” It is upwards of 300 years since the Magistrates and Town Council of Glasgow made the first attempts to improve the Clyde, then a shallow, brawling stream, which could easily be crossed on foot even opposite Glasgow, and was only suitable for the navigation of herring boats, and similarly small craft. In 1768 an engineer, named Golborne, contracted the river by the construction of rubble jetties, and the removal of sand and gravel shoal by dredging, &c. From 1781 till 1836, the works carried on for the further improvement of the river under the direction, consecutively, of Golborne, Rennie, and Telford, consisted chiefly in the shortening of some, and the lengthening of other of Golborne’s jetties, the construction of additional jetties, the connecting of the outer ends of these jetties by half-tide training walls on both sides of the river, so as to confine the water and increase the ebb scour, and the removal of hard shoals by dredging. It was not till 1836 that the river from Glasgow to Port Glasgow was treated as a whole, and a true appreciation shown of its future by the Clyde Trustees’ then Engineer Logan, in the laying down of river lines, which, with some slight modifications and expansions, have up till now formed the limits of the river’s improvements. Parliamentary plans on these lines approved of by James Walker, Consulting Engineer to the Trustees, were submitted to and sanctioned by Parliament in 1840; but so inadequate was the appreciation of the depth required, that 20 ft. at high water neap tides was recommended by Logan as the extreme depth of the river and harbour, and a clause in the Act empowering the deepening to proceed until every part thereof shall have attained at least a depth of 17 ft. at high water neap tides. The depth in the harbour of Glasgow at the present time is from 25 ft. to 29 ft, and in the river from 27 ft. to 29 ft. at high water neaps, high water springs being about 2 ft. higher. The average tidal range of spring tides at Glasgow is 11 ft. 2 in., and at Port Glasgow 10 ft.; and of neaps at Glasgow 9 ft. 2 in., and at Port Glasgow 8 ft. 3 in. While jetties and training walls, or parallel dykes, performed a useful part in the early improvement of the river, it is to persistent dredging that the enormous increase in the magnitude of the river since 1840 is due. The early dredging was performed by large rakes, or porcupine ploughs, as they were called, because they were provided with strong iron teeth, wrought by hand capstans, which drew the material from the bed of the river on to the banks. Hand-wrought, and subsequently horse-wrought, dredges, with small buckets on a ladder, succeeded the plough, and in 1824 the first steam dredger was started on the river. It dredged, however, only to 10 ft 6 in. Now several of the dredges employed can work in 35 ft. depth of water. Mr. Deas, the engineer to the Clyde Trust, has stated[55] that it is due to the application of steam power to dredges, and the subsequent adoption of steam hopper barges for carrying the dredged material to the sea, that the rapid enlargement not only of the Clyde and the Harbour of Glasgow, but of the Tyne, the Tees, and several other similar rivers in recent years are due. But for the introduction of the latter, it would have been physically, financially, and otherwise impossible to have disposed, within so limited a time, of the enormous quantities of material which have been dredged from these various rivers and harbours. Up till 1862, all the material dredged from the river Clyde and harbour of Glasgow was loaded on punts holding eight cubic yards, and deposited on the alveus or foreshores, or the low-lying land adjoining the river. Many acres were thus reclaimed, to the great gain of the riparian proprietors, to whom the Trustees required to hand over the ground free of cost. The adoption of steam hopper barges, holding from 240 to 320 cubic yards each, removed these obstacles, and enabled the deepening, widening, and straightening of the river and harbour to be proceeded with more rapidly, without seriously obstructing the navigation with steam tugs and trains of punts. The result has been that while in 1861 the total quantity dredged and deposited on land was 593,176 cubic yards, the total quantity dredged in 1887 was 1,319,344 cubic yards, only 64,000 cubic yards of which was deposited on land. The total quantity dredged during the forty-two years ending 1888 amounted to 32,027,834 cubic yards, the quantity in the first twenty-one years being 9,091,544 cubic yards, and in the last twenty-one years, 22,936,290 cubic yards. In 1755, the Clyde at Glasgow was only 15 in. deep at low water, and 3 ft 8 in. at high water, while the depth at Marlinford, three miles below the harbour, was 18 in., and at Erskine, or Kilpatrick Sands, about eight miles below, and at Dumbuck Ford, ten miles below, only 2 ft. at low water. In 1781, the depth at Dumbuck Ford was 14 ft. at low water; it is now 20 ft. In 1806, Telford reports that on February 14th of that year the _Harmony_, of Liverpool, came up with ordinary spring tide, drawing 8 ft. 6 in. of water; but up till 1812, the river from the harbour downwards to Bowling was so shallow, that the _Comet_ required to leave Glasgow and Greenock, respectively, at or near high water to prevent it grounding in the river. Now, vessels drawing 23 and 24 ft. of water pass up the river almost daily. The Clyde Trust, who are charged with the control of the river, had expended thereon, up to the middle of 1887, upwards of eleven and a half millions sterling, and had, besides, contracted a debt of over four and a half millions. The accompanying diagram will show the depths of the channel in Glasgow harbour at different dates, but the whole of the river has been dredged constantly from that city down to Port Glasgow, a distance of nearly twenty miles, and the bed of the river between these points is now virtually level throughout. [Illustration: DEPTH OF THE CLYDE AT DIFFERENT PERIODS.] The shipping industry has, in consequence, enormously increased. In 1888, 8428 vessels, of 1,891,000 tons, entered, and 8053 vessels, of 1,444,000 tons, cleared from Glasgow in the coasting trade; while the total number of all vessels that entered in the same year was 8217, with 2,416,000 tons register, the clearances being 8738 vessels, with 2,787,000 tons. THE FORTH AND CLYDE CANAL. This, the most important Canal in Scotland, commences in Grangemouth harbour, in the small river Carron, about two miles, by the low-water channel, above its mouth in the estuary of the Forth. The general direction of the canal is that of west by south. It at first runs a considerable way on one level along the south side of the Carron, with which it again communicates by a cut from it at Bainsford, to that river at the Carron Iron Works. [Illustration: SECTION OF THE FORTH AND CLYDE CANAL.] The main line then passes to the north-west of Falkirk, and thence to Bonny Bridge, proceeding by the south side of Kilsyth, and along the south bank of the river Kelvin, and over the Logie Water by a stone aqueduct at Kirkintilloch. It then reaches Hamilton Hill about two miles from the north-west quarter of the city of Glasgow, to which there is a branch of two miles, and three quarters, communicating with a branch from the Monkland Canal at Port-Dundas Basin. The main line now proceeds Westerly, crossing the Kelvin by an aqueduct, and then runs along the side of the Clyde, till it at length locks down to that river at Bowling Bay. The main line is 35 miles long, 56 feet wide at top, 27 feet at bottom, and 10 feet deep. In 10¾ miles from Grangemouth to the summit, it rises 156 feet by 20 locks. The summit-level continues about 16 miles, and from it to the Clyde there is a descent of 156 feet by 19 locks. Each lock is 74 feet long by 20 feet wide. At lock No. 16 from Grangemouth, this canal connects with the Edinburgh, and Glasgow Union Canal. Instead of having the eastern extremity of this canal in the Carron, it was originally intended to have had it considerably farther east, or lower down the Forth, in the deeper water at Borrowstounness. This would have been an improvement, but probably one not so easily executed. The work was once really begun, and afterwards abandoned, chiefly, it is presumed, from the difficulty of passing over the river Avon, without raising the canal a good deal for several miles along the low carse lands. The remains of a bungled aqueduct bridge for this purpose were lately to be seen on the banks of that river. The present canal joining the Forth and the Clyde was begun in 1768, but it was suspended in 1777, and not resumed until after the close of the American war. It was completed in 1790. It was built on a larger scale than any of the English Canals up to that time. Originally the canal was about 8 ft. 6 in. deep, but its banks were afterwards raised, and the depth of water was increased to 10 feet. In completing this canal many serious difficulties were encountered. These, however, were successfully overcome; and though unprofitable for a while, it afterwards, for many years, yielded a handsome return to its proprietors, the dividend having been at one time about 28 per cent. on the original stock. Swift boats were established on this canal in 1832, and the waterway is historically interesting as having been the scene of some of the earliest experiments in steam propulsion. Reference has been made elsewhere to the proposals now under consideration with a view to the construction of another canal from the Forth to the Clyde. Should these proposals be carried out, the future of the existing Forth and Clyde Canal could hardly fail to be overcast, but as the canal is now virtually the property of the Caledonian Railway Company, that would not probably be greatly felt. THE UNION AND MONKLAND CANALS. There are two canals that are in the same locality as the Forth and Clyde, already alluded to, but of greatly subordinate importance. The Monkland serves the important iron and coal mining and manufacturing districts in the West, of which Airdrie and Coatbridge are the principal centres, and gives access therefrom to the Clyde. The Union Canal is really a feeder to, and branch of, the Forth and Clyde Canal, some distance further east. The Union Canal joins the Forth and Clyde Canal near Falkirk, and stretches thence to Edinburgh, being 31½ miles in length. It is 40 feet wide at the top, 20 at the bottom, and 5 deep, It was completed in 1822, but has been, in all respects, a most unprofitable undertaking. For many years the proprietors have not received any dividend, and their prospects, we understand, are not improving. A canal intended to form a communication between Glasgow, Paisley, and Ardrossan was commenced in 1807, but only that portion connecting Glasgow with Paisley and the village of Johnston has hitherto been finished. This part is about 12½ miles long, the canal being 30 feet broad at top, 18 at bottom, and 4½ deep. It was here that the important experiments were originally made on quick travelling by canals, which demonstrated that it was practicable to impel a properly constructed boat, carrying passengers and goods, along a canal at the rate of 9 or 10 miles an hour, without injury to the banks. THE CALEDONIAN CANAL. A valley remarkable for its uniformity, straightness, and depth, and extending from sea to sea, between two parallel ranges of steep mountains, divides the Highlands of Scotland into two nearly equal parts. The general direction of this chasm is from north-east to south-west, making an angle of about 35 degrees with the meridian; and, besides being entered at each extremity by an arm of the sea, viz., by the Moray Firth on the north, and Loch Linnhe on the south, the rest of its bottom is for the most part occupied by a series of rivers and lakes. The remarkably elongated form and contiguity of these lakes had long ago suggested the facility of forming an inland communication between the Atlantic Ocean and the German Sea. In order to accomplish this important object, it seemed sufficient to connect these lakes and the firths by several short canals amounting together to 23 miles, and thereby obtain a navigable line to an extent of more than 100 miles; and this was farther recommended by the summit-level only rising 94½ feet above the sea. So far back as the year 1773, this line had been surveyed by James Watt, who reported favourably of it, and proposed that the lakes should be connected by a canal of a very moderate size. Nothing further, however, was done till early in the present century, when the subject was taken up by Government, and new surveys were made by Messrs. Jessop and Telford, who recommended a canal of such dimensions as should admit frigates of thirty-two guns, and the greater part of merchant ships, particularly that class which trade between the Baltic and the ports of Ireland and the west coast of Britain; thus avoiding, it was hoped, a tedious, and often dangerous navigation by the Orkneys. The dimensions proposed by Telford, and mainly adhered to, were a width of 50 feet at bottom, 120 feet at top, and 20 feet deep; the locks from 170 to 180 feet long, and 40 wide, with a depth of 20 feet of water besides the lift, or rise. The canal has, however, only been excavated to the depth of 15 feet in the summit-level, though the width has been increased to 122 feet at the top, with such a break in the slope that there is on each side a horizontal shelf 6 feet broad at the depth of 2 feet under the surface of the water. The design in this break in the slope of the sides is to keep large vessels from approaching too close to the edge of the canal, and destroying the upper part of the banks, either by contact or by the eddy produced between the vessel and the sides of the canal. On the north, the Caledonian Canal commences with a sea lock at Clach-na-Carry, in a sheltered bay of Loch Beauly, which is the more inland part of the Moray Firth. The sea-lock here is about two miles north-west of Inverness, and three-quarters of a mile west of the Ferry of Kessock, which is near the mouth of the river Ness. In order to have sufficient depth of water at ordinary neap-tides, it was necessary, on account of the flatness of the shore, to place this lock 400 yards within sea-water mark, an operation attended with difficulty on account of the softness of the bottom. This lock is 170 feet long, 40 wide, with a lift of 8½ feet; and proceeding from it, the canal is formed by embankments till it passes the sea-mark, where another lock of the same size, with a lift of 6 feet, is built on firm ground. On the south of this is the Muirton basin, 967 yards long and 162 yards broad, with a wharf for the trade in that quarter, being about a mile from Inverness. At the southern extremity of this basin is a swivel or swing bridge for the public road between Beauly and Inverness; and then four locks, which, however, from their being connected, have only five double gates in the whole. These raise the canal 32 feet, which puts it on the ordinary summer level of Loch Ness. Each lock is 180 feet between the gates, and 40 feet wide. The canal thence proceeds until it meets, and runs along the north-west bank of the river Ness to the small lake Doughfour, which is about 2100 yards long, and from 5 to 9 fathoms deep, and is 6½ miles from Clach-na-Carry. It communicates with Loch Ness by the pass of Bona Ferry. The intended line of canal being on the west side of the river Ness, which in three different places approached close to the steep sides of the hills on the west, it was necessary to alter the course of that river, so as to obtain room for the canal without cutting into the hills. At the entrance to Loch Doughfour is a regulating, or guard-lock, without any lift, to prevent any overflow from the lake. It is 170 feet long, and 40 wide. It was necessary to deepen this small lock in several places by dredging, and to raise it 6 feet to the level of Loch Ness by a weir, and embankment. The next part of this navigation, and by far the most extensive lake in it, is Loch Ness, a fine sheet of water about 24 miles long, and from 1 to 1½ miles broad. Its depth is so great that it never freezes, being from 5 to 129 fathoms, and along the middle it averages 100. It affords good anchorage at each end, and also in a few bays, although the sides of this lake are generally straight. It was proposed to introduce buoys for more convenient moorings. There are nowhere in it either rocks or banks detached from the shore. Loch Ness receives the river Oich in its western shore not far from its southern extremity, and a little south of this the canal leaves the lake, whilst almost quite at the southern end stand the fort and village of Fort Augustus. From this the canal ascends 40 feet by five locks, and at Callachie, about 2½ miles further on, it rises 8 feet by another lock. Three miles more bring it to Loch Oich, where a regulating lock raises it 30 inches, so as to be even with that lake, which is on the summit level. To obtain a proper line for the canal upon the south-east side of the river Oich, the channel of that river has been somewhat altered. Loch Oich, which forms the summit-level of this navigation, is about 3¾ miles long, and on an average a quarter of a mile broad. In one place in the middle, and at both ends, it had to be deepened by dredging. The water which falls into this lake, particularly from the river Garry, affords at all times an ample supply for the canal. Between Loch Oich and the next lake in the line, Loch Lochy, there is no natural communication. The interval is about 1¾ miles, and rises 20 feet above the Loch Oich, which, with the depth of the canal, required a cutting of 35 feet. Loch Lochy, which was 21 feet 9 inches lower than Loch Oich, has been raised about 12 feet by an embankment to avoid rock-cutting, and the canal descends to it 9 feet 9 inches by two locks, one of which is also a regulating, or guard lock. Loch Lochy is 10 miles long, and averages one in breadth. In some places it is 76 fathoms in depth. About half a mile of the course of the river Lochy had to be shifted into a new bed to make room for the canal, which, now in its last stage, proceeds from the lake for 8 miles along the north-west bank of that river over a rugged surface to the shore of Loch Eil, which is the more inland part of the Firth, called Loch Linnhe. A little south of Loch Lochy there is a regulating lock; and about a mile from Loch Eil there are eight connected locks, called Neptune’s Stairs, by which the canal descends 64 feet. At Corpach shore it falls 15 feet by two locks, and, after expanding into a basin 250 yards long and 100 broad, it finally descends 7 feet 9 inches by the sea-lock into Loch Eil near Fort William. The entire length of this navigation is 60½ miles, and that of the artificial part, including Loch Doughfour, is 23 miles. There are in all twenty-eight locks. This canal has, as yet, been a most unprofitable speculation, not even paying the expense of its maintenance. Before leaving the waterways of Scotland, it may be interesting to remark that inland navigation occupied a good deal of attention from James Watt,[56] although the great mechanician did not accomplish so much in this direction as his contemporary, Brindley. Watt was employed in 1767 to make a survey for a canal of junction between the rivers Forth and Clyde, by what was called the Lomond passage, and attended Parliament on the part of the subscribers, where the Bill was lost. An offer was then made to him of undertaking the survey and estimate of an intended canal for the Monkland Collieries to Glasgow, and these proving satisfactory the superintendence of the execution was confided to him. This was quickly followed by his being employed by the Trustees for Fisheries and Manufactures in Scotland to make a survey for a canal from Perth to Forfar, through Strathmore; and soon afterwards by the Commissioners of the Annexed Estates, to furnish a report and estimate of the relative advantages of opening a communication between the Forth of Clyde and the western ocean, by means of a navigable canal across the isthmus of Crinan,[57] or that of Tarbert. Business of this description crowded upon him; and surveys, plans, and estimates, were successively undertaken by him for the deepening of the river Clyde, the rendering navigable of the rivers Forth and Devon, and the water of Leven; the making of a canal from Machrihanish Bay to Campbeltown, and of another between the Grand Canal and the Harbour of Borrowstounness. But the last and greatest work of the kind upon which Watt was employed was the survey and estimate of the line of the canal between Fort William and Inverness, since executed, as we have seen, by Telford, upon a larger scale than was at that time proposed. Estuaries hardly come within the scope of the present work, otherwise the Forth Bridge, recently opened by the Prince of Wales, would demand and deserve an extended notice. That remarkable engineering achievement, due to the genius of Sir John Fowler and Sir Benjamin Baker, is likely for a long time to remain a unique _tour de force_ as a means of communication between the opposite shores of an arm of the sea, and opens up a vista of possibilities in regard to transport that were undreamt of until recently. FOOTNOTES: [55] Paper read in 1888 before the Institution of Naval Architects. [56] James Watt was born at Greenock on the 19th January, 1736, and died at Heathfield on the 25th August, 1819. His great invention was the steam engine; but he was an almost universal genius, having been almost equally at home in many branches of antiquity, metaphysics, medicine, and etymology, architecture, music, and law, the modern languages, and German logic and poetry. [57] This canal has since been carried out, and now forms an important link in the chain of communication between the west of Scotland and Inverness, viâ the “Royal,” or West Coast route.

Chapters

1. Chapter 1 2. INTRODUCTION AND OUTLINE. 3. 3. For domestic water supply. 4. INTRODUCTION AND OUTLINE iii 5. CHAPTER I. 6. CHAPTER II. 7. CHAPTER III. 8. CHAPTER IV. 9. CHAPTER V. 10. CHAPTER VI. 11. CHAPTER VII. 12. CHAPTER VIII. 13. CHAPTER IX. 14. CHAPTER X. 15. CHAPTER XI. 16. CHAPTER XII. 17. CHAPTER XIII. 18. CHAPTER XIV. 19. CHAPTER XV. 20. CHAPTER XVI. 21. CHAPTER XVII. 22. CHAPTER XVIII. 23. CHAPTER XIX. 24. CHAPTER XX. 25. CHAPTER XXI. 26. CHAPTER XXII. 27. CHAPTER XXIII. 28. CHAPTER XXIV. 29. CHAPTER XXV. 30. CHAPTER XXVI. 31. CHAPTER XXVII. 32. CHAPTER XXVIII. 33. CHAPTER XXIX. 34. CHAPTER XXX. 35. CHAPTER XXXI. 36. CHAPTER XXXII. 37. CHAPTER XXXIII. 38. CHAPTER XXXIV. 39. CHAPTER XXXV. 40. CHAPTER I. 41. 1. The era of waterways, designed at once to facilitate the transport 42. 2. The era of interoceanic canals, which was inaugurated by the 43. 3. The era of ship-canals intended to afford to cities and towns remote 44. part 600 ft. above the level of the sea, and has in all 114 locks and 45. CHAPTER II. 46. 1. That the freer the admission of the tidal water, the 47. 2. That its sectional area and inclination should be made to 48. 3. That the downward flow of the upland water should be 49. 4. That all abnormal contaminations should be removed from 50. CHAPTER III. 51. 1. They admit of any class of goods being carried in the 52. 2. The landing or shipment of cargo is not necessarily 53. 3. The dead weight to be moved in proportion to the load is 54. 4. The capacity for traffic is practically unlimited, 55. 5. There is no obligation to maintain enormous or expensive 56. 6. There is an almost total absence of risk, and the 57. 1. A total absence of unity of management. For example, on 58. 2. A want of uniformity of gauge in the locks, as well as in 59. 3. With few exceptions they are not capable of being worked 60. 5. The many links in the communications in the hands of the 61. CHAPTER IV. 62. CHAPTER V. 63. CHAPTER VI. 64. 1. The construction of a National canal, passing right 65. 2. The conversion of the existing waterways into a ship 66. 3. The construction of a ship canal between the Forth and 67. 4. The construction of a canal from the Irish Sea to 68. 5. The construction of a ship canal between the Mersey and 69. 6. A canal to connect the city and district of Birmingham, 70. 8. The improvement of the Wiltshire and Berkshire canal, so 71. 1. By a ship canal, that would enable vessels of 200 tons at 72. 2. By a canal that would enable canal boats to navigate the 73. 3. By the construction of an improved canal, between the 74. CHAPTER VII. 75. 1886. The works, including land, cost 74,000_l._, or 15,206_l._ per 76. CHAPTER VIII. 77. 1745. This canal joined the Havel with the Elbe at Parcy. It is about 78. CHAPTER IX. 79. CHAPTER X. 80. 1. _The Voorne Canal_ running from Helvoetsluis through the island of 81. 2. _The Niewe-waterweg_, or direct entrance from the North Sea to 82. 1. _The Walcheren Canal_, about seven miles long, from the new port of 83. 2. _The South Beveland Canal_, from the West Schelde at Hansweert 84. 1. _The Afwaterings Kanaal_, from the Noordervaart and the Neeritter, 85. 2. _The canalised river Ijssel_, from the river Lek, opposite to 86. 3. _The Keulsche Vaart_, from Vreeswijk, on the river Lek, _viâ_ 87. 4. _The Meppelerdiep_, Zwaartsluis to Meppel, for vessels of length, 88. 5. _The Drentsche, Hoofdvaart, and Kolonievaart_, from Meppel to Assen, 89. 6. _The Willemsvaart_, from the town canal at Zwolle to the 90. 7. _The Apeldoorn Canal_, from the Ijssel at the _sluis_ near 91. 8. _The Noordervaart_, between the Zuid Willemsvaart at _sluis_ No. 92. 9. _The Dokkum Canal_, from Dokkum (in Friesland) to Stroobos, and 93. CHAPTER XI. 94. 1000. The total fall is 21·73. Besides the works just described, 480 of 95. CHAPTER XII. 96. CHAPTER XIII. 97. CHAPTER XIV. 98. CHAPTER XV. 99. 1880. There were in the latter year 73 boats on the canal, averaging 100. CHAPTER XVI. 101. 1. That one uniform size of locks and canals be adopted throughout the 102. 2. That the locks on the proposed Bay Verte Canal be made 270 feet long 103. 3. That the locks on the Ottawa system be made 200 feet long and 45 104. 4. And that the locks in the Richelieu river be made 200 feet long and 105. CHAPTER XVII. 106. CHAPTER XVIII. 107. CHAPTER XIX. 108. CHAPTER XX. 109. 1880. In 1885, the gross tonnage was close on nine millions, and the 110. 1. A maritime canal from sea to sea, with a northern port on 111. 2. A fresh-water canal from Cairo to Lake Timsah, with 112. 1. The lands necessary for the company’s buildings, offices, 113. 2. The lands, not private property, brought under 114. 3. The right to charge landowners for the use of the water 115. 4. All mines found on the company’s lands, and the right to 116. 5. Freedom from duties on its imports. 117. CHAPTER XXI. 118. CHAPTER XXII. 119. CHAPTER XXIII. 120. 35. The Panama Canal, again, although approximately about the same 121. 1765. The aqueduct and the neighbouring viaduct (shown in the old 122. CHAPTER XXIV. 123. 1. That part of the canal situated in the plains to be 124. 2. At the same time as the above-mentioned work was 125. 3. Towards the end of the year 1883 several large 126. 1888. The geological strata to be passed through in excavation does 127. CHAPTER XXV. 128. CHAPTER XXVI. 129. introduction of such waterways.[228] They were upheld and protected by 130. CHAPTER XXVII. 131. CHAPTER XXVIII. 132. CHAPTER XXIX. 133. CHAPTER XXX. 134. CHAPTER XXXI. 135. CHAPTER XXXII. 136. CHAPTER XXXIII. 137. CHAPTER XXXIV. 138. 1. The invention or devices to be tested and tried 139. 2. That the boat shall, in addition to the weight 140. 3. That the rate of speed made by said boat shall 141. 4. That the boat can be readily stopped or backed 142. 5. That the simplicity, economy, and durability 143. 6. That the invention, device, or improvement can 144. CHAPTER XXXV. 145. 1. The whole system of ‘inland navigation’ would be 146. 2. All chances of monopoly and trade restriction by 147. 3. Government security would ensure capital being raised 148. 4. By adopting a ‘sinking fund,’ these navigations might 149. 5. Would facilitate uniformity of classification, toll, 150. 6. The question of railway-owned canals would thus be 151. 7. Also the difficulty of floods would be removed as 152. 8. The above advantages, whilst affording unbounded 153. 1. Public opinion is not yet ripened to enable such a 154. 2. To successfully compete with railways (who have now 155. 3. If the Government did not undertake the carrying, 156. 4. The patronage being placed in the hands of 157. 5. For the good canals a very high price would have to 158. 6. In justice to the railways, the Government could 159. 7. The present enormous capital of railways, 160. 1462. River Ouse (Yorkshire) Navigation. 161. 1572. Exeter Canal ” 162. 1699. River Trent Navigation 163. 1796. Salisbury and Southampton Canal. 164. 1852. Droitwich Junction Canal.

Reading Tips

Use arrow keys to navigate

Press 'N' for next chapter

Press 'P' for previous chapter