A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 2 of 2 by J. M. Robertson
9. It is thus a complete mistake on the part of Buckle to affirm
1720 words | Chapter 125
that the activity of the French reformers up to 1750 was directed
against religion, and that it was thereafter turned against the
State. Certainly there was much freethinking among instructed men
and others, but it proceeded, as under Louis XIV, mainly by way of
manuscripts and conversation, or at best by the circulation of English
books and a few translations of these; and only guardedly before 1745
by means of published French books. [976] The Abbé Ranchon, in his
MS. Life of Cardinal Fleury, truly says that "the time of the Regency
was a period of the spirit of dissoluteness and irreligion"; but when
he ascribes to "those times" many "licentious and destructive writings"
he can specify only those of the English deists. "Precisely in the
time of the Regency a multitude of those offensive and irreligious
books were brought over the sea: France was deluged with them." [977]
It is incredible that multitudes of Frenchmen read English in the days
of the Regency. French freethinkers like Saint Evremond and Deslandes,
who visited or sojourned in London before 1715, took their freethought
there with them; and the only translations then in print were those
of Collins's Discourse of Freethinking and Shaftesbury's essays on
the Use of Ridicule and on Enthusiasm. Apart from these, the only
known French freethinking book of the Regency period was the work of
Vroes, a councillor at the court of Brabant, on the Spirit of Spinoza,
reprinted as Des trois imposteurs. Meslier died not earlier than 1729;
the Histoire de la philosophie payenne of Burigny belongs to 1724;
the Lettres philosophiques of Voltaire to 1734; the earlier works
of d'Argens to 1737-38; the Nouvelles libertés de penser, edited by
Dumarsais, to 1743; and the militant treatise of De la Serre, best
known as the Examen de la Religion, to 1745.
The ferment thus kept up was indeed so great that about 1748 the
ecclesiastical authorities decided on the remarkable step of adopting
for their purposes the apologetic treatise adapted by Jacob Vernet,
professor of belles lettres at Geneva, from the works of Jean-Alphonse
Turrettin, [978] not only a Protestant but a substantially Socinian
professor of ecclesiastical history at the same university. The
treatise is itself a testimony to the advance of rationalism in the
Protestant world; and its adoption, even under correction, by the
Catholic Church in France tells of a keen consciousness of need. But
the dreaded advance, as we have seen, was only to a small extent yet
traceable by new literature. The Examen critique des apologistes de la
religion chrétienne of Lévesque de Burigny was probably written about
1732, and then and thereafter circulated in manuscript, but it was
not published till 1766; and even in manuscript its circulation was
probably small, though various apologetic works had testified to the
increasing uneasiness of the orthodox world. Such titles as La religion
chrétienne demontrée par la Resurrection (by Armand de la Chapelle,
1728) and La religion chrétienne prouvée par l'accomplissement des
prophéties (by Père Baltus, 1728) tell of private unbelief under the
Regency. In 1737 appeared the voluminous treatise (anonymous) of the
Abbé de la Chambre, Traité de la véritable religion contre les athées,
les déistes, etc. (5 vols.). In 1747, again, there appeared a learned,
laborious, and unintelligent work in three volumes (authorized in
1742), Le Libertinage combattu par la témoignage des auteurs profanes,
by an unnamed Benedictine [979] of the Congregation of St. Vanne. It
declares that, between atheism and deism, there has never been so
much unbelief as now; but it cites no modern books, and is devoted to
arraying classic arguments in support of theism and morals. Part of the
exposition consists in showing that Epicurus, Lucian, and Euripides,
whom modern atheists are wont to cite as their masters, were not and
could not have been atheists; and the pious author roundly declares
in favour of paganism as against atheism.
So much smoke tells of fire; but only in 1745 and 1746 did the printed
Examen of De la Serre and the Pensées philosophiques of Diderot begin
to build up in France the modern school of critical and philosophic
deism. When in 1751 the Abbé Gauchat began his series of Lettres
critiques, he set out by attacking Voltaire's Lettres philosophiques,
Diderot's Pensées philosophiques, the anonymous Discours sur la vie
heureuse (1748), Les Moeurs [980] (1748), and Pope's Essay on Man;
taking up in his second volume the Lettres Persanes of Montesquieu
(1721), and other sets of Lettres written in imitation of them. In the
third volume he has nothing more aggressive of Voltaire's to deal with
than La Henriade, the Mahomet, and some of his fugitive pieces. And
the Bishop of Puy, writing in 1754 his La Dévotion conciliée avec
l'esprit, could say to the faithful: "You live in an age fertile in
pretended esprits forts, who, too weak nevertheless to attack in front
an invincible religion, skirmish lightly around it, and in default of
the reasons they lack, employ raillery." [981] The chivalrous bishop
knew perfectly well that had a serious attack been published author
and publisher would have been sent if possible to the Bastille, if
not to the scaffold. But his evidence is explicit. There is here no
recognition of any literary bombardment, though there was certainly
an abundance of unbelief. [982]
Buckle has probably mistaken the meaning of the summing up of some
previous writer to the effect that up to 1750 or a few years later
the political opposition to the Court was religious, in the sense of
ecclesiastical or sectarian (Jansenist), [983] and that it afterwards
turned to matters of public administration. [984] It would be truer
to say that the early Lettres philosophiques, the reading of which
later made the boy Lafayette a republican at nine, were a polemic for
political and social freedom, and as such a more direct criticism of
the French administrative system than Voltaire ever penned afterwards,
save in the Voix du Sage et du Peuple (1750). In point of fact, as
will be shown below, only some twenty scattered freethinking works had
appeared in French up to 1745, almost none of them directly attacking
Christian beliefs; and, despite the above-noted sallies of Voltaire,
Condorcet comes to the general conclusion that it was the hardihood
of Rousseau's deism in the "Confession of a Savoyard Vicar" in his
Émile (1762) that spurred Voltaire to new activity. [985] This is
perhaps not quite certain; there is some reason to believe that his
"Sermon of the Fifty," his "first frontal attack on Christianity,"
[986] was written a year before; but in any case that and other
productions of his at once left Rousseau far in the rear. Even now he
had no fixed purpose of continuous warfare against so powerful and
cruel an enemy as the Church, which in 1757 had actually procured
an edict pronouncing the death penalty against all writers of works
attacking religion; though the fall of the Jesuits in 1764 raised new
hopes of freedom. But when, after that hopeful episode, there began
a new movement of Jansenist fanaticism; and when, after the age of
religious savagery had seemed to be over, there began a new series
of religious atrocities in France itself (1762-66), he girded on a
sword that was not to be laid down till his death.
Even so late as 1768, in his last letter to Damilaville (8 fév.),
Voltaire expresses a revulsion against the aggressive freethought
propaganda of the time which is either one of his epistolary
stratagems or the expression of a nervous reaction in a time of
protracted bad health. "Mes chagrins redoublent," he writes, "par
la quantité incroyable d'écrits contre la religion chrétienne, qui
se succédent aussi rapidement en Hollande que les gazettes et les
journaux." His enemies have the barbarism to impute to him, at his
age, "une partie de ces extravagances composées par de jeunes gens
et par des moines défroqués." His immediate ground for chagrin may
have been the fact that this outbreak of anti-Christian literature
was likely to thwart him in the campaign he was then making to
secure justice to the Sirven family as he had already vindicated
that of Calas. Sirven barely missed the fate of the latter.
The misconception of Buckle, above discussed, has been widely
shared even among students. Thus Lord Morley, discussing the
"Creed of the Savoyard Vicar" in Rousseau's Émile (1762), writes
that "Souls weary of the fierce mockeries that had so long been
flying like fiery shafts against the far Jehovah of the Hebrews,
and the silent Christ of the later doctors and dignitaries,"
may well have turned to it with ardour (Rousseau, ed. 1886, ii,
266). He further speaks of the "superiority of the sceptical parts
of the Savoyard Vicar's profession ... over the biting mockeries
which Voltaire had made the fashionable method of assault"
(p. 294). No specifications are offered, and the chronology is
seen to be astray. The only mockeries which Voltaire could be said
to have made fashionable before 1760 were those of his Lettres
philosophiques, his Mondain, his Défense de Milord Bolingbroke,
and his philosophically humorous tales, as Candide, Zadig,
Micromégas, etc.: all his distinctive attacks on Judaism and
Christianity were yet to come. [The Abbé Guyon, in his L'Oracle
des nouveaux philosophes (Berne, 1759-60, 2 tom.), proclaims an
attack on doctrines taught "dans les livres de nos beaux esprits"
(Avert. p. xi); but he specifies only denials of (1) revelation,
(2) immortality, and (3) the Biblical account of man's creation;
and he is largely occupied with Diderot's Pensées philosophiques,
though his book is written at Voltaire. The second volume is
devoted to Candide and the Précis of Ecclesiastes and the Song
of Solomon--not very fierce performances.] Lord Morley, as it
happens, does not make this chronological mistake in his earlier
work on Voltaire, where he rightly represents him as beginning his
attack on "the Infamous" after he had settled at Ferney (1758). His
"fierce mockeries" begin at the earliest in 1761. The mistake may
have arisen through taking as true the fictitious date of 1736
for the writing of the Examen Important de Milord Bolingbroke. It
belongs to 1767. Buckle's error, it may be noted, is repeated by
so careful a student as Dr. Redlich, Local Government in England,
Eng. tr. 1903, i, 64.
Reading Tips
Use arrow keys to navigate
Press 'N' for next chapter
Press 'P' for previous chapter